top of page

Schedule

Due to many changes happened throughout the entire semester, our schedule was fluidic and flexible. On the other hand, it was better for us to test the entire system as earlier as possible since our design naturally makes every subsystem indivisible. Table. 1 is our entire schedule and Figure 1. shows the big picture of our schedule with Gantt Chart.

Table 1: Schedule

​

Week                Date                           Assignment                                               Group Tasks

     1                    Jan. 31                        Design Proposal, Website                      -Build Mock-up

    2                    Feb. 5                         Mock-up Demo                                      -Part Selection

-                                                                                                                                -Sensor Lab

    3                    Feb. 12                        Motor Demo                                           - Micro controlled DC, RC, Stepper motor Lab

    4                    Feb. 19                        System Demo 1                                       -CAD development

                                                               Website check 1                                       -Torque, Power, Suction Analysis

    5                    Feb. 26                      System Demo 2                                       -Suction Demo

                                                                                                                                   -Simulation Program

    6                    Mar. 5                         Design Presentation                                -Simulation of coverage/motion

                                                               Peer evaluation                                         -Initial Fabrication

                                                                                                                                    -Suction Demo

    7                     Mar. 12                       Spring Break                                             -Build First Prototype

    8                     Mar. 19                      System Demo 3                                       -First autonomous attempt to demo swing

                                                                                                                                      motion with power tether

    9                     Mar. 26                      System Demo 4                                       -Autonomous attempt to demo swing motion

                                                                                                                                     -Initial cleaning system demo

                                                                                                                                     -Mount sensors and barrier detection

   10                     Apr. 4                        System Demo 5                                       -Autonomous attempt to demo swing motion

                                                                                                                                     -Integrate cleaning system

                                                                                                                                     -Integrate battery system

    11                     Apr. 9                         System Demo 6                                       -Autonomous attempt to demo swing motion

                                                                                                                                     -Calibrate IMU and sensors

                                                                                                                                     -Attempt detecting barrier

   12                     Apr. 16                       System Demo 7                                        -Autonomous attempt to demo swing motion

                                                                                                                                     -Demonstrate effective cleaning

                                                                                                                                     -Demonstrate autonomous barrier cross

   13                    Apr. 23                        Final Demo                                                -Demonstrate full functionality

                                                                                                                                      -Show properly functioning washer

Figure 1:  Gantt Chart of the Schedule

Budget

Our total cost ended up to be $1,315, which was not expected before the last week of this semester. In the very beginning, we bought linear servos, geared servos, valves as our major components after finding parts fitting our design concepts. High-torque linear and geared servos for our robot to perform rotations against gravity were especially the most expensive parts in our robot. Still, our robot should be cheap, which costed around $500 to build the first prototype. However, couples of electrical issues finally burnt our major components. We replaced our linear servos  2 times that increased our cost by $158. Moreover, the urgency made us to pay $80 more for shipping in order to get components before final demos and the public presentation. Hence, we spent beyond the original budget in the end. Figure 2 shows the entire list of parts we bought.

Figure 2:  Budget List

Risk Management

Time Management

Building a robot with a novel design was really risky. Considering we might face more potential failures, we met regularly on Fridays in addition to team meetings before talking to professors and TAs on Mondays and Wednesdays. This helped every member know the up-to-date progress of  our robot. We also made major testings, such as attempts to move autonomously on the window, during the meetings on Friday. On the other hand, due to the indivisibility of our design, we assigned time slots for each member to do their work sequentially. That is, everyone can have the robot for a period of time to implement certain functions.

​

​

Potential Failure

One of the major concern of our design was that whether the robot can attach suctions cups to the window and made transitions was unknown til the first self-moving prototype made. We did suction force analysis beforehand. We also made a simulation program to compute the rotating angles needed to implement each motion state. Though we encountered into more potential failures than we expected, getting some implementations done even before the first prototype was made really helped us have a better understanding of our design. As a result, we did solve suction force issues. However, the unexpected noises from our pump still caused us fail to send digital commands to the robot. Hence, we were still not able to demonstrate the full functionality of our robot in the end.

​

​

​

Component Failure

To prevent us from losing development time due to some burnt parts, we bought additional parts, such as batteries and acrylic sheets, if they were not expensive. We can then replace a broken component with a new one as soon as possible.

Document

Pittsburgh, PA, USA

©2018 BY WINDOW MONKEY. PROUDLY CREATED WITH WIX.COM

bottom of page